Woody v. Peairs
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition originally made to the Supreme Court to prevent a Superior Court from enforcing a judgment for contempt, and transferred to the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District for hearing and decision. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Petitioner applied to the supreme court for a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent from punishing petitioner for contempt of court, and the proceeding was duly transferred to this court for hearing and decision.
From the petition and from the return of respondent, the following facts appear: The petitioner, at all times mentioned, was the duly elected, qualified, and acting auditor of Kern County. On the third day of June, 1915, one J. J. Deuel petitioned the superior court of Kern County for an order allowing his two certain claims for services, one in the sum of $240 and the other in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- County of Yolo v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex parte WidberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McAllister v. HamlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex parte TrumanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Murphy v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Albermont Petroleum, Ltd. v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Uhler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Allen v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- M. B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- County of Fresno v. Roberson, Martin & Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.