Legal Opinion

M. B. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 2002No. B160315PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

The petition for writ of mandate raises two issues of first impression: whether a California criminal grand jury has the power to issue a subpoena duces tecum; and if it does, whether such a subpoena is defective if it is served without the good cause affidavit required by Code of Civil Procedure sections 1985 and 1987.5.

We conclude California criminal grand juries have the power to issue subpoenas duces tecum, and that such subpoenas do not require good cause affidavits.

Background

This proceeding arises out of a grand jury investigation into allegations that petitioners…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Andrew Lee RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Kling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. City of Woodlake v. Tulare County Grand JuryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People Ex Rel. Pierson v. Superior Court of El Dorado CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API