Legal Opinion
County of Fresno v. Roberson, Martin & Co.
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided April 8, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 15PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENT, J.*
Defendants herein demurred to plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend and entered judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
In the complaint the following facts are alleged:
The 1952 Fresno County grand jury made court approved contract on April 28,1952, with defendants to examine books, records and accounts as authorized by Penal Code, section 928. The agreed compensation was not to exceed the sum of $10,000 “provided that in case it appeared…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. GlassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Nielsen v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Allen v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Rico v. Nasser Bros. Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- MacBeth v. MacBethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Edwards v. HrebecMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- CTY. OF FRESNO v. Roberson, M. & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Opinion No. (2001), California Attorney General Reports2001