Legal Opinion

Ex parte Widber

California Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1891No. 20829PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a discharge upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco.

Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure is as follows : —

“ Sec. 144. If suitable rooms for holding the superior *368courts and the chambers of the judges of said courts be not provided in any city and county, or county, by the supervisors thereof, together with the attendants, furniture, fuel, lights, and stationery sufficient for the transaction of business, the courts, or the judge or judges thereof, may direct the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boys' & Girls' Aid Society v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Ex parte ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Corenevsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Trower v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Uhler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Woody v. PeairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API