Legal Opinion

Stauffer v. Stauffer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1955No. Civ. 20944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Appeal by defendant from interlocutory judgment of divorce. The only question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the court’s finding that the residence of the parties, located in Burbank, California, is community property. Having so found the court awarded it to the wife. The title stands of record in the names of both spouses as joint tenants.

The testimony of defendant, if accepted, would have justified a finding that the property was in fact owned in joint tenancy. But that of plaintiff, which the court obviously did accept, afforded ample basis…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Schindler v. SchindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lovetro v. SteersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Beck v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Bordenave v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
  5. Hansen v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API