Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Schindler

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1954No. Civ. 20186PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

Declaring that it was impossible to continue to live together as husband and wife, respondent commenced an action against appellant for divorce on October 1, 1952. In her complaint she alleged that certain real property known as 14041 Roblar Road, Sherman Oaks, California, was community property.

Her specific averment in that regard was “that the title to said property stands of record in the names of the parties hereto as joint tenants for the purpose of convenience only and for no other reason, and said property was intended between the parties hereto to be at all times…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Estate of Young v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
  3. McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Hicks v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Peters v. PetersNevada Supreme Court · 1976

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API