Legal Opinion

Bordenave v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 2, 1957No. Civ. 7344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action under the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C.A. §§ 1340 and 1346, to recover income taxes which are alleged to have been erroneously and illegally collected by defendant. The case came on regularly for trial, the Court sitting without a jury has heard all the evidence, both parties have submitted post-trial memoranda, and the case is now ready for decision.

The facts are relatively undisputed. By stipulation of the parties, the sole issue in the case is whether certain farm property (hereinafter referred to as the Farmington Ranch) owned by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Petersen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Murphy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Murphy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Petersen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API