Legal Opinion

Miller v. Cortese

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1952No. Civ. 18560PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Appeal from an order setting aside a default and the judgment entered thereon, and from an order refusing to vacate the order setting aside the default and judgment.

This action to recover $20,000 as a real estate broker’s commission was commenced on July 1, 1948. Plaintiff is the assignee of the broker, Alden B. Coyne. The defendants-named in the complaint were Ross W. Córtese, M. H. Bershin, Doe One, Doe Two and Doe Three. A return of service of summons and complaint shows that the summons and complaint were served on “Mike E Dinow, sued herein as Doe One,” on August…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Los Angeles Bill Posting Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Crofton v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. James A. Clay & Co. v. ShaferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Miller v. CorteseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Batte v. BandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Wilson v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API