Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Goldman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1969No. Civ. 9184PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AULT, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs Woodrow A. Wilson and Mary Jane Wilson appeal from an order setting aside an entry of default and a default judgment against the defendant, Allen Goldman, for $40 000 ($20,000 for each- plaintiff), in a personal injury action. The motion to set aside the default was made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473, and was principally based upon an affidavit filed by defendant’s counsel in which he alleged he had been unable to appear at the trial because he was ill and hospitalized on the trial date and had undergone major surgery only three days before. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reher v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Potts v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Warden v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rooney v. Vermont Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Kahn v. KahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. In Re Marriage of GoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Heidary v. YadollahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Dils v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API