Legal Opinion

Batte v. Bandy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1958No. Docket Nos. 23395, 23355, 23380, 23079PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *

All of the above entitled proceedings present the single basic question, namely: the validity of the service of process in the action hereinafter referred to upon Cole Investment Company, a defendant therein, and in consequence the validity of the ensuing judgment by default entered therein against said defendant.

On May 16, 1955, Fred Batte and others, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, instituted an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County against C. L. Bandy and a number of other defendants including Cole Investment Company, hereinafter referred to as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kahn v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Svistunoff v. SvistunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Morgan v. ClappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Harris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Mundo v. FústerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  3. Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Sanford v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API