Legal Opinion

M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. British-American Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 8, 1924No. 1666PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity, brought by M. Eowenstein & Sons, Inc., a New York corporation, against the British-American Manufacturing Com'pany, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, and the receiver of that corporation and others, to foreclose a mortgage given by the British-American Manufacturing Company to the plaintiffs as security for a loan of $125,000, made April 2, 1920. The defenses pleaded by the receiver'are: (1) That the mortgage was not authorized; and (2) that it was usurious and within the Connecticut statutes providing against the bringing of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Railway Co. v. Whitton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Andrews v. PondSupreme Court of the United States · 1839

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Lamb v. HerndonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Miley Petroleum Corp., Ltd. v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Fred G. Clark Co. v. E. C. Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Ewalt v. Mortgage Securities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API