Legal Opinion
Phoenix City Council v. Canyon Ford, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 27, 1970No. 1 CA-CIV 1269PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
The issue in this case is whether or not a sign being manufactured in Tennessee is a nonconforming use.
In 1967 the appellee, hereinafter referred to as Canyon Ford, began construction of the facilities for a new Ford dealership in Phoenix, Arizona, In September of 1967 the building was completed but certain signs had yet to be erected on the main building. On September 13, 1967, Canyon Ford entered into a contract with Ford Motor Company wherein the Ford Motor Company was to provide it with four identical S' x 30' signs. The total contract price for the signs was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Anderson v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Gannett Outdoor Co. v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Heilker v. Zoning Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.