Legal Opinion

Acord v. General Motors Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1984No. C-2392PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

The principal issue presented in this products liability case is the propriety of an instruction given by the trial court in conjunction with a jury inquiry of defective design. Roy Acord, Petitioner, brought suit as a result of an accident in which his wife was killed and his minor son was injured when their vehicle was struck by a G.M.C. truck after the truck’s brakes failed. Acord alleged strict liability against General Motors Corporation and common law negligence against Gilbert Johnson d/b/a Johnson’s Fleet Service. The jury answers on issues of liability were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Turner v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. General Motors Corp. v. HopkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Henderson v. Ford Motor CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. LedesmaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. In the Interest of V.L.K.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In the Interest of Z.L.T.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Clancy v. Zale Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API