Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Ledesma

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2007No. 05-0895PublishedCited by 336 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Willett

In this products liability case, Ford Motor Co. argues that the trial court reversibly erred in charging the jury by giving an incomplete definition of “manufacturing defect.” We agree. Additionally, we hold that a frequently submitted definition of “producing cause” should no longer be used. We remand the case for a new trial under a jury charge that reflects our applicable caselaw, including our decision today.

I. Background

In March 1999, Tiburicio Ledesma, Jr. purchased a new Ford F-350 Super Duty pickup truck for his construction business. The truck had four rear tires, two on each side,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. RidgwayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. TamezTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by336 opinions

  1. Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. City of AltonTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis MunozTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gharda USA, Inc. and Gharda Chemicals, Ltd. v. Control Solutions, Inc., United Phosphorus, Inc., and Mark BoydTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Whirlpool Corp. v. CamachoTexas Supreme Court · 2009

331 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API