In the Interest of Z.L.T.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill
In this case, we decide whether the trial court abused its discretion by implicitly denying a pro se inmate’s request for a bench warrant. We hold that it did not. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment.
I
The Attorney General filed suit to establish the parent-child relationship between Thompson and three minor children. Thompson, who was incarcerated and proceeding pro se, filed an application for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, also known as a bench warrant, requesting permission to appear personally at pre-trial and trial hearings. The record does not reflect an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lenz v. LenzTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Jeff T. Stone v. Ernest E. Morris, Assistant Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet Branch Segregation UnitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Shull v. United Parcel Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- in the Interest of D.S., N.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
- Hamilton v. PechacekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Fewins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Allen v. Rushing, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
- in the Interest of L.N.C & K.N.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.