Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McCardell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1963No. A-9094PublishedCited by 250 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the respondent sued for total and permanent incapacity resulting from an injury to his left hip and back caused by being kicked by a mule. The jury found respondent totally incapacitated for a period of five weeks, and inasmuch as petitioner had already paid that amount, judgment was entered that respondent take nothing. The Court of Civil Appeals has reversed and remanded. 360 S.W.2d 831. Hartford is petitioner here.

Petitioner contends that the Court of Civil Appeals was in error in holding, first, that the trial court was in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. MurphreeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bridges v. City of RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cook v. HamerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Agnew v. Coleman County Electric CooperativeTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Edwards v. OsmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by250 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bay Area Healthcare Group, Ltd. v. McShaneTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. v. Brookhollow, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984

245 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API