In the Interest of V.L.K.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES A. BAKER, Justice.
This is a child custody case. The issue here is whether the parental presumption, codified in Family Code section 153.131— that it is in the best interest of a child to be with a natural parent unless the appointment would impair the child’s physical health or emotional development — applies in a custody modification suit under Family Code section 156.101. We hold that the parental presumption applies only *340in original custody determinations and does not apply in a modification suit. Therefore, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and render judgment for the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Mitchell Energy Corp. v. AshworthTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Specialty Retailers, Inc. v. DeMoranvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Legate v. LegateTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Acord v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Thota v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.