Mott v. Reeves
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Edgcomb, J.:
Section 44 of the Personal Property Law (as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 507), making void, as against the creditors of the vendor, any sale, transfer or assignment in bulk of any part, or the whole of a stock of merchandise, unless certain things are done by both seller and buyer, is in derogation of the common law, and of one’s right to dispose of his property without restriction, and must, therefore, be strictly construed.
Giving to the statute the accurate interpretation required, defendant insists that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover for three reasons, viz.: (1) That…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Groves v. SlaughterSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Gallus v. ElmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Everett Produce Co. v. Smith Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re SchoenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Sternberg v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Brod v. Supreme Dress Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Ben Bimberg & Co. v. Unity Coat & Apron Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
- In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.