Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Haviland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse. (Ramsdell, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action of trover for the conversion of 1 sliingle-mill frame, 1 knot-sawing machine and arbor, 7 small circular saws, 200 feet of belting, 50 feet of shafting, 20 pulleys, 1 gumming machine complete, 1 shingle jointer complete, 1 wheelbarrow, 1 crowbar, 1 cant-hook, and 1 edger complete. Plaintiff had verdict and judgment.

The evidence tended to show the following facts: In 1872 a copartnership, composed of the plaintiff and two-others, under the firm name of Bartlett, Bonny & Saxton, owned a piece of land upon which was situated a portable steam saw-mill, containing a boiler,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Conrad v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Scudder v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Oakland County Gas & Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Couch v. WelshUtah Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API