McPartin v. Clarkson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
On February 1, 1924, Frank Cahill, conducting a pool room and cigar and candy stand, occupied a store building in Manchester, as a tenant of defendant Clarkson, and was delinquent for rent in the sum of $140. Clarkson sued out a writ of attachment which the .sheriff, defendant Robison, levied on two of six pool tables. It is sufficient to say of this levy that the sheriff did not take actual possession of the two tables; his inventory and appraisal did not identify two particular tables; and they were left in the full possession of the defendant.
On December 11, 1925, the sheriff came back…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Quackenbush v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hoja v. MotocMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Patmos v. Grand Rapids Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Wright v. AaronSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Garner v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Gretzinger v. Wynne Wholesale Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Hood Rubber Products Co. v. DickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.