Lisbon Square v. United States
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on the Plaintiffs Claims and for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts I and III of the Defendants’ Counterclaim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”) in the above-captioned matter. For the following reasons, the Court (1) finds that it either lacks jurisdiction, or that the defendants are entitled to summary judgment, as to each of the plaintiffs claims, (2) grants summary judgment for the defendants in the amount of $590,-000.00 as to Count I of their…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Davin J. Anderson v. Alaska Housing Finance CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- United States v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. McMillanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- Oakbrook Village Associates v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- United States v. ColemanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.