Legal Opinion

Oakbrook Village Associates v. Cisneros

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 30, 1998No. CIV. A. 96-3795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

This suit arises from the December 21, 1995 non-judicial foreclosure sale of property known as the Oakbrook Village Apartments located in New Orleans, Louisiana. Plaintiff Oakbrook Village Associates (Oakbrook) instituted this suit against the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (“the Secretary”) and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to the Multi-Family Foreclosure Act of 1981 (“the Act”), 12 U.S.C. § 3701, et seq.

The Act establishes a set of priorities for payment of proceeds from the foreclosure of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Katz v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Brighton Village Associates, Herbert F. Gold, Juan M. Cofield, James E. Cofield, Jr., Trustee, and Herbert F. Gold, Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds & Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. McMillanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API