Legal Opinion
United States v. Schlesinger
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 10, 2000No. Civ. AMD 98-891PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Acting at the behest of the Secretary of the federal department of Housing and Urban Development (“the Secretary” or “HUD”), the United States instituted this civil action for damages against the former operator of an affordable housing project known as Riverdale Village Apartments (the “Project”), located in Baltimore County, Maryland, Richard M. Schlesinger, and several companies he owns or controls (hereafter “Schlesinger”). The Government generally alleges that over the ten years Schlesinger operated the Project with the benefit of HUD…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. LivecchiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- United States v. Retirement Services GroupCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Guillermety v. Secretary of Education of the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- United States v. Envicon Development Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.