Epps v. United States Capitol Police Board
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Dismissing The Plaintiff’s Complaint for Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief can be Granted
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. The plaintiff, a former member of the Library of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Schmidt v. United States Capitol Police BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Cofield v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.