Legal Opinion
Kerr v. Heckler
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 30, 1983No. C-1-82-1295PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND OTHER EXPENSES
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter is now before the court upon a claim by the plaintiff for an award of attorney fees and expenses (doc. 9). 1 The above action was one to review an adverse decision of the Secretary terminating the benefits which the plaintiff had been receiving under Title II of the Social Security Act. On May 16, 1983, this Court found that the termination of benefits was not supported by substantial evidence (doc. 6). Pursuant to the review statute, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), we remanded this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Photo Data, Inc. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Berman v. SchweikerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Ocasio v. SchweikerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Wolverton v. SchweikerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Correa v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Meyers v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Trujillo v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1984
- Howard v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Hull v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.