Legal Opinion
Hull v. Bowen
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 5, 1990No. C87-1086PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION RE: AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
KRENZLER, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is an application for attorney fees filed by plain tiff’s counsel (“counsel”). Counsel seeks attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and the Social Security Act (“Act”). 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), (2). 1
Plaintiff previously applied for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under the Act pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. Plaintiff alleged an onset date of October 31, 1985. The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) 2 denied…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kirk v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shaw v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Ringel v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- King v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Kling v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human Services of the United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- Carpenter v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.