Legal Opinion
BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 29, 1982No. 28-81PublishedCited by 167 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an application under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Supp.IV 1980) (the Act), for attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in the petitioner’s successful appeal to the' United States Court of Claims from a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board), denying an upward price adjustment in a government contract. We deny the application for attorney’s fees and expenses.
I
The dispute that gave rise to the present application grew out of a fixed price contract under which the applicant agreed to operate for one year a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Photo Data, Inc. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Alspach v. District Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Citizens Coalition for Block Grant Compliance v. City of EuclidDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
- OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL U. NO. 3, ETC. v. BohnDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Broad Avenue Laundry & Tailoring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by167 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- George R. WEAKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Wallis D. CORNELLA, Appellant, v. Richard SCHWEIKER, Secretary, Health & Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.