Legal Opinion
City of Stamford v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 1988No. 6031PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The plaintiff city appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court, upholding the eligibility of a former employee of the city to collect unemployment compensation. The plaintiff claims the trial court erred (1) in failing to adopt the finding of *740the state employment security board of review (hereafter board of review) that the claimant occupied a policy-making or advisory position, and in holding such a position was exempt from unemployment compensation eligibility, (2) in making a finding that was not supported by the subordinate facts and the evidence, and (3) in concluding that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Finkenstein v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Royce v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- City of Stamford v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988