Legal Opinion

Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 1990No. 7924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an insurance carrier providing uninsured motorist coverage may deduct from those proceeds payable to its insured the full amount of any unreimbursed reparations payments1 without contributing to its insured’s expenses, namely, attorney’s fees, in procuring the uninsured motorist recovery. The trial court rendered judgment requiring the defendant insurance carrier to contribute to those expenses in an amount proportionately equal to the plaintiff’s contribution. We affirm.

The case was tried upon the following stipulated facts. The plaintiff was injured…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Della GhelfaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Salmon Brook Convalescent Home, Inc. v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BraccidiferroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Augeri v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Dugas v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API