Legal Opinion

Calnan v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 17, 1996No. 15654PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant administrator of the unemployment compensation act (administrator) appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs appeal from the determination by the *780board of review of the employment security appeals division (board) that the plaintiff lacked sufficient cause to leave her job and its denial of unemployment compensation benefits. On appeal, the administrator asserts that the trial court improperly reviewed the board’s findings of fact for support in the evidence because, as a matter of law, the trial court was bound by the board’s findings of fact.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guevara v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Taminski v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  3. City of Stamford v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. JSF Promotions, Inc. v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Chavez v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  3. Shah v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  4. Belica v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Ray v. ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMP.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API