Continental Supply Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
We have carefully considered the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing filed in this cause in' connection with the oral argument, and are constrained to the opinion that the motion. should be overruled, and that the former, opinion heretofore rendered by Judge Hamilton correctly decides the iiuestions involved.
Whatever may be the correct rule, as to voluntary and involuntary conveyances of real estate with reference to the sufficiency of the descriptions therein, and without reference to whether the Supreme Court of this state has in fact determined that the same rule applies to voluntary and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watson v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Smith v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Harris v. ShaferTexas Supreme Court · 1893
- Tram Lumber Co. v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- McElroy v. DancigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Granato v. BravoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- White v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Graham Nat. Bank v. CougerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.