Matney v. Odom
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Taylor
This is an action for specific performance of an option for the sale of four acres of land contained in a ten-year written lease executed in April, 1939, by Arthur G. Odom, as lessor, and J. N. Matney, as lessee. The court (the trial was without a jury) concluded, among other things, that the description of the land set out in the contract was insufficient to comply with the statute of frauds (Art. 3995, R. C. S.), and rendered judgment accordingly that plaintiff was not entitled to specific performance. The judgment was affirmed by the Texarkana Court of Civil Appeals, Chief Justice Hall…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Greer v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1946
- Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Osborne v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1923
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Long Trusts v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Texas Builders v. KellerTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Templeton v. Dreiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Swinehart v. Stubbeman, McRae, Sealy, Laughlin & Browder, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.