Tram Lumber Co. v. Hancock
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Jasper. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Ford.
1Opinion of the Court
Acker, Judge.
Appellant, the Tram Lumber Company, claimed the land in controversy under a deed from the collector of taxes, purporting to have been executed in pursuance of a sale of the land made for non-payment of taxes assessed against it. This deed, when offered in evidence, was excluded on objection of appellees, and this is assigned as error. The land attempted to be conveyed thereby is described as thirty-seven hundred and eighty-eight acres of the Martin Flores league.
As has been repeatedly decided by this court, such a deed is void for uncertainty and insufficiency of description of…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Matney v. OdomTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Garrett v. ChristopherTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Threadgill v. BickerstaffTexas Supreme Court · 1895
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.