Legal Opinion

McElroy v. Danciger

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1922No. 1960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

This action was brought by Danciger against McElroy and Burton, on a contract for damages in the sum of $10,000, stipulated for in the contract as liquidated damages, and against the City National Bank of Wichita Falls, as a stakeholder, the allegations being in effect that appellee and appellants entered into a contract by which appellee obligated himself to sell to appellants an oil and gas lease in and to 240 acres of land, for which appellants agreed to pay $42,000, and, as part of the contract, appellants deposited in escrow $10,000 with the bank as earnest money; that appellee complied…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hermann v. LikensTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SettegastTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Watson v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1888

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls v. HaggertonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Callahan v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Oetting v. Flake Uniform & Linen Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Oliver v. CorzeliusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API