Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Hug

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1984No. Civ. 53161PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that in marital dissolution actions the trial court has broad discretion to select an equitable method of allocating community and separate property interests in stock options granted prior to the date of separation of the parties, which became exercisable after the date of separation. It was not an abuse of discretion, under the facts of this case, for the trial court to allocate those interests by applying a time rule, finding that the number of options determined to be community property is a product of a fraction in which the numerator is the period in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of GillmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Re the Marriage of ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Baccanti v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  5. In Re Marriage of LehmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API