Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Short

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1995No. 61176-9PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

We accepted review to determine whether the employee stock options furnished to Petitioner Robert Short by his employer, the Microsoft Corporation, are characterized as separate property or community property under RCW 26.16. The King County Superior Court found the stock options part separate property and part community property. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding the stock options entirely community property. We conclude the Microsoft stock options are part separate property and part community property. We reverse the Court of Appeals in part, affirm in part, and remand the case to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jane Doe v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Re the Marriage of BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Connell v. FranciscoWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Seizer v. SessionsWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. In Re Marriage of ZahmWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. DeJesus v. DeJesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API