Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Lehman

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1998No. S062850PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this cause in order to address an important question relating to the characterization of retirement benefits as community or separate property under a so-called “defined benefit retirement plan,” which specifies payments in advance in accordance with a formula that comprises factors such as final compensation, age, length of service, and a per-service-year multiplier: Does a nonemployee spouse who owns a community property interest in an employee spouse’s retirement benefits under such a plan own a community property interest in the retirement benefits as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Emard v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Marriage of BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Schmalle v. SchmalleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Caverly v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Kellogg v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API