Henry v. P. & E. Finance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HURST, V.C.J.
The plaintiff, P. & E. Finance Company, sued the defendant, W. A. Henry, Jr., for possession of a Packard automobile. Plaintiff held a chattel mortgage covering the automo.-bile. The defendant pleaded usury. The trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
The material facts leading up to the controversy are as follows: Henry owned a Chrysler automobile, and agreed with Ralph Sigmon, a dealer in used cars, to trade it for a Plymouth automobile and to pay a cash difference of $630. Before the deal was closed, the plaintiff was called in with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Clapp v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Mayer v. American Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- United Tire & Investment Co. v. TroneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Davis v. RothenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Cobb v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- CIT Corporation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.