Legal Opinion

Henry v. P. & E. Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1946No. 32489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, V.C.J.

The plaintiff, P. & E. Finance Company, sued the defendant, W. A. Henry, Jr., for possession of a Packard automobile. Plaintiff held a chattel mortgage covering the automo.-bile. The defendant pleaded usury. The trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The material facts leading up to the controversy are as follows: Henry owned a Chrysler automobile, and agreed with Ralph Sigmon, a dealer in used cars, to trade it for a Plymouth automobile and to pay a cash difference of $630. Before the deal was closed, the plaintiff was called in with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Clapp v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Mayer v. American Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. United Tire & Investment Co. v. TroneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Davis v. RothenbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cobb v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  4. CIT Corporation v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. McGalliard v. Liberty Leasing Co. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API