Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Baxter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1956No. 36611PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $15,000.99 collected and held by defendant on accounts in his wholesale meat business, plaintiff contending that the accounts, together with others over a period of months, had been sold to her on a discount basis; and the amount sought was the total due on accounts transferred by the transactions.

By answer and cross-petition, defendant alleged that on and after February 7, 1951, and during March, 1951, he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowe v. HickorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. United Tire & Investment Co. v. TroneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Henry v. P. & E. Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Kahan v. SchonwaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coosewoon v. Meridian Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Richard Hefley and Kent Martin D/B/A Agri Investment Services v. Harry JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API