Davis v. Rothenberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ESTES, C.
Parties,will -be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, inverse to their order here. Rothenberg, Ehrlich and Berlinger, copartners doing business as Rothenberg & Schloss, had judgment against Davis for $200 -and interest on three promissory notes signed by Davis and his wife, showing that the signature of his wife was executed by him; such judgment being rendered c*n an instructed verdict on motion of plaintiffs at the conclusion of the evidence on trial de novo in the district court. Defendant appeals. The judgment was for the wife of Davis on the showing that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clapp v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- National Novelty Import Co. v. MuncySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Cahill v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mayer v. American Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Enosburg Grain Co. v. Wilder ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.