Legal Opinion
Mermelstein v. Maki
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 23, 1993No. 93 Civ. 0916 (SS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, District Judge.
Defendants removed this action to federal court on February 16, 1993. Plaintiff moved to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), contending that the removal was untimely. By Opinion and Order dated May 20, 1993 (the “May 20 Opinion”), I concluded that “factual issues, including who received the pleadings and when they were received,” cautioned against my ruling on plaintiffs motion, and I directed defendants to supplement the “paltry record” then before me. At a hearing held for that purpose on June 28, 1993, defendants failed to come…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Soler v. G & U, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Gates Construction Corp. v. KoschakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Moore v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Figueroa v. KimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kunica v. St. Jean Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. WaterfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Bradley Industrial Park v. Commissioner of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1996