Legal Opinion
Insurance Co. of State of Pa. v. Waterfield
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 25, 2005No. CIV. 304CV1533JBAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES [DOC. # 7]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
The Insurance Company of Pennsylvania commenced an action in Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Wind-ham at Putnam, on November 18, 2003 against Dean Waterfield, alleging that Wa-terfield owed the Plaintiff $35,000.00 plus attorney’s fees for its payment of a surety bond. The two parties engaged in substantial motion practice in state court until September 14, 2004, when the Defendant filed notice of removal. The Plaintiff then filed a motion to remand [Doc. # 7] pursuant to 28…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Tongkook America, Inc. v. Shipton Sportswear CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McPhatter v. SweitzerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Dudley v. Putnam Investment FundsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Rescuecom Corp. v. ChumleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- Nardone v. EdeeDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Rzasa v. BJ's Restaurants, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2023