Legal Opinion
Hvamstad v. City of Rochester
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 8, 1979No. 48888PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The above-entitled appeal came on for hearing before a division of this court on January 23, 1979, and was considered and decided by the court en banc. Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the Olmsted County District Court, entered on April 14, 1978, denying plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction, be, and the same is, affirmed pursuant to Rule 136.01(2), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.
MEMORANDUM
An appeal from an order denying a motion for a temporary injunction is strictly limited in scope. The lower court’s ruling on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- City of Indianapolis v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg ABCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Sargent v. Bethel Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994