Legal Opinion
OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 29, 1984No. C2-83-1729, C4-83-1795PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
OT Industries, Inc. (OTI) appeals from an order denying its request for a temporary injunction, and OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg Ab (OT-tehdas) appeals from the denial of its motion for a change of venue and motion to dismiss.
OTI contends that the distributorship agreement between OTI and OT-tehdas is governed by the Minnesota Franchise Act and that OT-tehdas’ termination . of the agreement was ineffective because it violated the Act. Therefore, OTI contends that the trial court erred in denying OTPs request for a temporary injunction which would enjoin OT-tehdas both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Milliken and Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- RJM Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Banfi Products Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1982
- Martin Investors, Inc. v. Vander BieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sound of Music Co. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Premier Wine & Spirits of South Dakota Inc. v. E. & J. Gallo WineryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Implement Service, Inc. v. Tecumseh Products Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
- Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.