Legal Opinion

Marvel Specialty Co. v. Magnet Mills, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1969No. 64 Civ. 2127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.

In this action plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant’s now expired patent No. 2,560,655 (hereinafter referred to as the ’655 patent), issued on July 17, 1951, is invalid and was not infringed by the use of plaintiff’s device. Defendant counterclaims for infringement.

Both parties agree that the manufacture of ladies’ nylon hosiery is hampered by the tendency of the nylon thread to accidently snag causing a loop to appear in the finished product, and that for years prior to the issuing of patent ’655 this loop was corrected by spreading…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A. R. Mosler & Co. v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Van Alen v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Thompson v. DickeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hellenic Inc. v. Bridgeline Gas Distribution LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. ABB Robotics, Inc. v. GMFanuc Robotics Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Soot v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Olympia Werke Aktiengesellschaft v. General Electric Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API