Windle v. Parks & Woolson Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District ■of Vermont.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The specification states that “cloth is ■now measured by contact with a rotating cylinder, which latter draws the cloth at the surface speed of the cylinder, each rotation of the cylinder being recorded.” The proof shows that, besides the machines in which the cloth passed over the cylinder and was drawn by it, there *382were machines in which the measuring cylinder rested on the cloth,, and was revolved by the forward movement of the same. The latter may, for convenience, be called “undershot wheels.” It is self-evident, and the record of earlier devices shows, that, while…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gunn v. SavageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1887
3Cited by13 opinions
- Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- George Cutter Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Good Roads Co. v. Charles Hvass & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Thompson v. DickeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.