Legal Opinion

Application of Carl W. Walter

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 14, 1961No. Patent Appeal 6662PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 21 of Walter application Ser. No. 487,728, filed February 14, 1955, for “Fluid Administering Equipment.” 1

Claim 21 was copied, for interference purposes, from Ryan patent 2,704,544, issued March 22, 1955, assigned to Abbott Laboratories, entitled “Venoelysis Equipment.”

Applicant’s specification states at the outset,

“This invention concerns the supplying and administering of fluids including particularly whole blood and fractions thereon subcutaneously, including parenteral,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. Lester C. Crome v. Henton MorroghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Thompson v. DickeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Julian Robert Anthony BealeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Don G. Hutton and Christopher L. WilsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Don G. Hutton and Christopher L. WilsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Julian Robert Anthony BealeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Carl W. Walter v. George R. RyanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API