Legal Opinion
Mitchell & Weber, Inc. v. Williams Bridge Mills, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 16, 1936PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The suit is brought under the Declaratory Judgment Act (Jud.Code, § 274d, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400). Motion is made for preliminary injunction. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to preliminary injunction is the matter for determination.
The bill shows that the plaintiff and the defendant Williamsbridge Mills are New York corporations, competitively engaged in the blouse business; that two design patents on styles of blouses were recently issued to the defendant Hyman, who gave an exclusive license under the patents to Williamsbridge Mills; that the plaintiff had made and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Zenie Bros. v. MiskendDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Automotive Equipment v. Trico Products CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- In Re Lawrence B. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.