Legal Opinion
Zenie Bros. v. Miskend
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 1935PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs brought a bill with two counts, the first for declaratory judgment, the second for injunction against unfair competition. The motion is to dismiss the bill as insufficient on its face.
The plaintiffs, according to the bill, are partners, one residing in New York and the other in New Jersey; the defendant Miskend resides in New York, and the defendant Lande & Miskend, Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of New York. The substance of the bill is that letters patent were recently issued to Miskend, covering a seam for garments and the method of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boyle Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Leach v. Ross Heater & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BeverfordenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.