Legal Opinion
Treemond Co. v. Schering Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 3, 1941No. 7684PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
Some District Courts seem to have found difficulty in freeing themselves from the strait-jacket of the “adversary” conception. They exhibit a tendency toward a narrow and technical interpretation 1 of an Act 2 intended to be construed in accordance with its broad and wise purpose. 3 The case at bar is, we think, a typical instance. The defendant-patentee, a manufacturer, informed the customers of the plaintiff-appellant, an importer and vendor of a certain chemical known as “Estradiol” that it alone had the right to manufacture that chemical. It also had the following…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Samuel Goldwyn, Inc. v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- E. W. Bliss Co. v. Cold Metal Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Societe De Conditionnement en Aluminium v. Hunter Engineering Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. Boris SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Japan Gas Lighter Association v. Ronson Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.